Case Study: Spacelabs SafeNSound™
Overview
Nurses working in intensive care settings are all too familiar with the overwhelming distraction of constant alarming from patient monitors, ventilators, beds, medication pumps, vital signs monitors, and other medical devices in their care area. Research indicates that 72% to 99% of all alarms are not actionable, which can lead caregivers to become desensitized to critical alarms—a condition commonly known as alarm fatigue. This desensitization can create serious patient safety issues when clinicians do not respond to alarms because they assume the alarms require no intervention(1).

A Need for Change
Even the most committed clinicians cannot address alarm fatigue on their own. If hospital leaders do not prioritize alarm system safety and the reduction of non-critical alarms, both clinicians and patients will suffer.
A few sobering facts(2):
- In a busy critical care unit, medical personnel can be exposed to up to 5,000 alarms in a single shift
- A hospital reported an average of one million alarms going off in a single week in a medium-sized health care facility
- A children’s hospital reported 5,300 alarms in a day – 95% of them false.
- A hospital reported at least 350 alarms per patient per day in the intensive care unit in a medium-sized health care facility.
The Joint Commission stresses in its 2019 National Patient Safety Goals that alarm standards should be customizable for specific clinical units, groups of patients, or individual patients to combat alarm fatigue. To implement meaningful, department-wide improvements in alarm customization, hospitals need the right data and tools.
Success through Change
A hospital in Texas recently implemented Spacelabs SafeNSound™ technology and began utilizing the software’s alarm management tools to review alarm data reports and make meaningful changes that would not negatively affect patient care. SafeNSound offers a variety of alarm reports to help clinicians make the best decisions possible when managing their patients.
| Alarm Summary Report |
| Provides a retrospective overview of general alarms, limit alarms, alarm durations, and alarms by location. |
| Alarms by Device Report |
| Provides a detailed retrospective review of all alarms per device. |
| Limit Alarms Report |
| Provides a detailed report of all limit alarms and a retrospective review of the quantity of such alarms. Reports how many, when they occur and alarm categories. |
| General Alarm Report |
| Provides a detailed retrospective review report of all general alarms. |
| Noise Alarms |
| Provides a detailed report showing noise alarms specific for each department and device. |
| Device Notifications |
| Provides an SMS message when devices |
After reviewing alarm detail, a decision was made to adjust the R on T PVC alarm parameters. By changing the settings, this facility was able to reduce this one alarm by 30,000 alarms in one month. You can see this in the alarm limits report and graph below where the alarm settings were adjusted on 1/16 and the reduction in R on T PVC alarms that resulted. This was a significant reduction in nuisance alarms per device – 40%. The hospital is now continuing its review of what alarms can be safely adjusted to positively impact staff and patients.
Conclusion
Effective alarm management strategies enable prioritization of critical alarms and elimination of nuisance alarms. The goal is to send only actionable notifications and appropriate patient, caregiver, and event context, so that caregivers can respond faster and collaborate better where patients need that critical support.
This product is not available for sale in all countries. Please contact your local Spacelabs Healthcare representative or regional office for more information. Case study reference: 030-2508-00 Rev B